1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1996 Opel Omega
To start off, 1996 Opel Omega is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Opel Omega weights approximately 250 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1996 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1996 Opel Omega | |
Make | Chrysler | Opel |
Model | Le Baron | Omega |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2740 mm |