1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,210 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econovan weights approximately 95 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2003 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Econovan |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2210 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2210 mm |