1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2490 mm |