1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | Le Baron | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 72 L |