1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2005 Smart ForTwo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 375 kg more than 2005 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2005 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Smart |
| Model | Le Baron | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1820 mm |
