1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 848 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Le Baron | Tundra |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3270 mm |