1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2006 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 178 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2006 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Le Baron | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2260 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1358 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2840 mm |
