1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 50 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Le Baron | Colt |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2210 cc | 2834 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 95 L |