1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2009 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 380 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan Armada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 2009 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | Le Baron | Armada |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3140 mm |
