1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Le Baron | XF |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2908 mm |