1989 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler New Yorker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler New Yorker. (135 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler New Yorker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler New Yorker weights approximately 90 kg more than 2009 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chrysler New Yorker (228 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Chrysler New Yorker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler New Yorker | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | New Yorker | Matrix |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2610 mm |