1989 Chrysler TC vs. 1977 Ford 2000
To start off, 1989 Chrysler TC is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Ford 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Ford 2000 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chrysler TC (176 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1977 Ford 2000. (99 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 1977 Ford 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler TC weights approximately 217 kg more than 1977 Ford 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Ford 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Ford 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Ford 2000. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Ford 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler TC | 1977 Ford 2000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | TC | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 90.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 1257 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2780 mm |
