1989 Chrysler TC vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1989 Chrysler TC is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chrysler TC (176 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler TC weights approximately 704 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler TC | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
Model | TC | 102 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2160 mm |