1989 Chrysler TC vs. 2003 Ford Puma
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chrysler TC (176 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler TC weights approximately 436 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler TC | 2003 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | TC | Puma |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 1038 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2450 mm |
