1989 Chrysler TC vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chrysler TC (176 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chrysler TC (271 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1989 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler TC | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | TC | Epica |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |