1989 Chrysler TC vs. 2010 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chrysler TC (176 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2010 SsangYong Rodius. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 2010 SsangYong Rodius. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 449 kg more than 1989 Chrysler TC.
Because 2010 SsangYong Rodius is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SsangYong Rodius. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Rodius (342 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler TC | 2010 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
Model | TC | Rodius |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3010 mm |