1989 Chrysler TC vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler TC. (176 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler TC.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler TC | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | TC | XF |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2908 mm |