1989 Chrysler TC vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler TC weights approximately 23 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler TC | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | TC | C30 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2639 mm |