1989 Chrysler Viper vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Viper would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chrysler Viper (449 HP) has 239 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chrysler Viper (664 Nm) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 1989 Chrysler Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Colorado. 2009 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1989 Chrysler Viper has manual transmission. 1989 Chrysler Viper will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Viper | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Viper | Colorado |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7986 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 449 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 664 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |