1989 Citroen AX vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1989 Citroen AX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen AX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen AX (52 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen AX should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Zastava 850 K weights approximately 130 kg more than 1989 Citroen AX.
Because 1968 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen AX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen AX | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | AX | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2010 mm |
