1989 Citroen AX vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen AX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen AX would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1989 Citroen AX. (52 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen AX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 404 kg more than 1989 Citroen AX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen AX. (86 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen AX.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen AX | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | AX | 6 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 86 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 68 L |