1989 Citroen Axel vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen Axel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen Axel would be higher. At 652 cc (2 cylinders), 1989 Citroen Axel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1989 Citroen Axel. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen Axel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen Axel weights approximately 80 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen Axel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen Axel. (50 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen Axel.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen Axel 2002 MCC Crossblade
Make Citroen MCC
Model Axel Crossblade
Year Released 1989 2002
Engine Size 652 cc 599 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type boxer in-line
Horse Power 34 HP 70 HP
Torque 50 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3210 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 820 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 3730 mm 2630 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 1810 mm