1989 Citroen BX vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1989 Citroen BX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen BX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen BX (71 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen BX should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen BX weights approximately 160 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen BX (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen BX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen BX | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | BX | 102 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2160 mm |