1989 Citroen CX vs. 1972 DAF 66
To start off, 1989 Citroen CX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen CX (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen CX weights approximately 399 kg more than 1972 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen CX (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen CX | 1972 DAF 66 | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | CX | 66 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1106 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 46 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 159 Nm | 75 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 826 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 42 L |
