1989 Citroen CX vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1989 Citroen CX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen CX (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen CX weights approximately 560 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen CX (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen CX | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | CX | 102 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2160 mm |
