1989 Citroen CX vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1989 Citroen CX. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1989 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1989 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen CX | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | CX | TL |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2840 mm |