1989 Citroen CX vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen CX weights approximately 17 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen CX. (159 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen CX | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | Mustang |
Year Released | 1989 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 160 Nm |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 321 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |