1989 Citroen CX vs. 2006 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2006 Dodge Durango is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen CX would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Durango (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1989 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1054 kg more than 1989 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Durango (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen CX | 2006 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | CX | Durango |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2279 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 102 L |