1989 Citroen CX vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1989 Citroen CX. (138 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 296 kg more than 1989 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen CX. (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen CX. 2010 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1989 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1989 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen CX | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | CX | Charger |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |