1989 Citroen XM vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 170 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | Crestline |
Year Released | 1989 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2940 mm |