1989 Citroen XM vs. 1962 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 1962 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1962 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Citroen | Reliant |
Model | XM | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1989 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 185 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2290 mm |