1989 Citroen XM vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 330 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (225 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | XM | 2000 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |