1989 Citroen XM vs. 1964 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Fiat Grand Break (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Fiat Grand Break should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 1964 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Fiat Grand Break (142 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 1964 Fiat Grand Break will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1964 Fiat Grand Break | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | XM | Grand Break |
Year Released | 1989 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |