1989 Citroen XM vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden HD (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden HD should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1966 Holden HD | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | XM | HD |
Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |