1989 Citroen XM vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 160 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen XM | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Citroen | Mercury |
| Model | XM | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 6392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2830 mm |
