1989 Citroen XM vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 425 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (177 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Citroen | Riley |
Model | XM | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2380 mm |