1989 Citroen XM vs. 1968 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.

Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 1968 Ford Mustang
Make Citroen Ford
Model XM Mustang
Year Released 1989 1968
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2975 cc 7010 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 168 HP 335 HP
Torque 235 Nm 597 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 105 mm
Engine Stroke Size 73 mm 101.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.6:1
Top Speed 220 km/hour 204 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2750 mm