1989 Citroen XM vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (110 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 329 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Citroen | Matra-Simca |
Model | XM | Murena |
Year Released | 1989 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2088 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 91.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 81.6 mm |
Top Speed | 192 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1051 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2440 mm |