1989 Citroen XM vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (168 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 268 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (235 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | 929 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |