1989 Citroen XM vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (169 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (240 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | XM | 66 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |