1989 Citroen XM vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (108 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 472 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (235 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 1982 Nissan Pulsar
Make Citroen Nissan
Model XM Pulsar
Year Released 1989 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2088 cc 1270 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 96 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1337 kg 865 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2420 mm