1989 Citroen XM vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (168 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 650 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (235 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen XM | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | XM | 102 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2160 mm |
