1989 Citroen XM vs. 1992 Ford Tempo

To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (168 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 225 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (235 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 1992 Ford Tempo
Make Citroen Ford
Model XM Tempo
Year Released 1989 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2975 cc 2986 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 204 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 3250 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1195 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2540 mm