1989 Citroen XM vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 1995 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (134 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 1995 Mazda MX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM. 1989 Citroen XM has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda MX-3 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda MX-3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Citroen XM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1995 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | XM | MX-3 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 134 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2460 mm |