1989 Citroen XM vs. 1996 Holden Nova
To start off, 1996 Holden Nova is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1996 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1996 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 249 kg more than 1996 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (240 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1996 Holden Nova | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | XM | Nova |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1314 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2470 mm |