1989 Citroen XM vs. 1996 Mazda RX-7

To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 8 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-7.

Because 1996 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (177 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 1996 Mazda RX-7
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM RX-7
Year Released 1989 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2616 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 130 HP 238 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 177 Nm 296 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 5000 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 1302 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2430 mm