1989 Citroen XM vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (255 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1989 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1989 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Citroen XM | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | XM | FTO |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2088 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 255 Nm | 202 Nm |
Top Speed | 192 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |