1989 Citroen XM vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Citroen XM weights approximately 250 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 1996 Rover 200
Make Citroen Rover
Model XM 200
Year Released 1989 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2510 mm