1989 Citroen XM vs. 2000 Mazda 626

To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 76 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.

Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (392 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (177 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Citroen XM 2000 Mazda 626
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM 626
Year Released 1989 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2496 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 130 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 177 Nm 392 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 84.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 74 mm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 1386 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2620 mm