1989 Citroen XM vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (108 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 8 kg more than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (235 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1989 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1989 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Citroen XM | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | XM | CU-X |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2088 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1337 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |
